Nearly 31 years after he was convicted of rape and armed robbery, Kirk Odom on Tuesday all but won his fight to be declared an innocent man.
The Justice Department filed court papers saying, “there is clear and convincing evidence that Mr. Odom is innocent of the charges for which he was convicted,” and apologized for the “terrible injustice.”
Prosecutors confirmed that DNA tests and hair analysis ruled him out as the culprit in a 1981 crime in Washington, D.C., but only after Odom spent more than two decades in prison, was placed on parole until 2047 and was forced to register as a convicted sex offender.
Odom is one of only about 300 people nationwide to be exonerated by DNA after conviction. A judge must sign off on the motion to throw out Odom’s convictions, but both sides described that as a foregone conclusion.
Odom met NPR this week outside the H. Carl Moultrie Courthouse. The building is named after the judge who sentenced him to spend more than 20 years behind bars.
“Well, I wouldn’t want to go in there, not in the wrong door, no way,” Odom says.
Odom says when he drives, he avoids stopping anywhere near the building in downtown Washington, not far from the historic National Mall. “This is just where, where it all happened at, you know,” he says.
At Home, With A Witness
In the spring of 1981, D.C. police accused Odom, then only 18 years old, of breaking into a woman’s house, raping her, and stealing hundreds of dollars in traveler’s checks.
Odom said he was home at the time, with his mom, waiting for his sister to return from the hospital with her brand new baby daughter. But neither police nor the jury bought his alibi.
“They didn’t believe it. Why? She’s my mom, you know, and moms protect their children. So, you know, they just disregarded that,” he says.
At the trial, the victim identified Odom and prosecutors presented evidence that they had matched him to hair taken from the crime scene.
A jury convicted him after only a few hours of deliberation.
The memory causes Odom to groan.
“Justice, justice at the time was just blind,” he says. “I mean they were just. They just wasn’t, I guess you could say, up to date. … It was chaos.”
That changed a couple years ago, when another inmate from the Washington, D.C., area was exonerated, in part based on faulty hair analysis.
Letters From Behind Bars
Odom’s public defender remembered his case and letters Odom wrote like this one, from 1982.
“I want to know why I have to do time for something I didn’t know about,” the letter says. “That lady don’t know me and I don’t know her.”
Sandra Levick, a lawyer at the Public Defender Service in Washington, took up his case. She calls Odom’s letters from prison “heartbreaking.”
“They are the written cries of someone who has at 18, been arrested for a brutal crime that he had nothing to do with,” Levick says. “And at 19, saw himself not only convicted but sentenced to 20 to 66 years in prison.”
Odom bounced around the system. It takes him more than half a minute to list all the places he’s been incarcerated.
He eventually got out on parole. Found a job fixing heating, air conditioning, plumbing systems. And he found a wife – Harriet Kopi-Odom.
“He’s got a good heart, he’s a hard working man, he’s very loving,” says Harriet.
And then Kirk Odom caught another break. At his lawyer’s request, the government found stained bed sheets, a robe, and that hair from the crime scene. They’d never been tested with state-of-the-art science. When the results came back, they cleared him.
A Victim’s Testimony
That still left the victim identification. But Odom’s lawyer, Sandra Levick, pointed out some problems.
“It was before dawn. She had the briefest opportunity to view her assailant. The circumstances were terrifying,” Levick says. ‘A gun was held to her head, the victim and her assailant were of different races.”
Experts like Jennifer Dysart, who teaches at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice, call bad witness identification “the leading contributing factor to wrongful conviction in this country.”
Dysart says all over the country, police have made big changes to the way they conduct lineups (making sure, for instance, that the people running the lineup don’t know who the suspect is) and do photo arrays (showing victims pictures one at a time, instead of a whole bunch simultaneously).
Not so much in D.C., where public defenders say legislation in the City Council to reform those practices have been opposed by prosecutors and police.
Odom, who celebrates his 50th birthday on Friday, says he just wants some peace.
“Life now, still a few clouds, dark clouds, but pretty soon the sun’ll shine through,” he says.