A federal court in New York has ruled that a group of interns at Fox Searchlight Pictures should have been paid for their work on the movie Black Swan. The decision may have broad implications for students looking for their first job.
Eric Glatt filed the federal lawsuit against Fox. He says everyone always told him taking an unpaid internship was the way to get his foot in the door in the film industry.
At Fox, he says he worked as an unpaid accounting clerk — filing, getting signatures, running checks and handling petty cash — but he was working for nothing.
“All these employers who think if they slap the title intern on the job description, suddenly they don’t have to pay for it,” he says.
Glatt says this week’s court ruling finally bursts what he calls the myth that employers are all offering interns great educational opportunities. “Businesses are not running free schools on their worksites,” he says. “What they’re doing is getting people to do work that their businesses need done.”
Tightening Up Regulation
The Department of Labor has set rules for when internships can be unpaid. Other courts have interpreted them to mean that unpaid interns need to be getting more from the company than the company gets from them.
But this week’s ruling goes even further, saying that unpaid internships must have an actual educational component independent of school credits or the job experience.
Juno Turner, Glatt’s attorney, says the ruling leaves little wiggle room. “I think that many, many internships fall into the category of wage theft and I think that this decision is a blow to that practice.”
Fearing A Negative Impact
Northeastern University law professor Roger Abrams calls the decision “extraordinary.” It means the good news for young people is that if you are lucky enough to get an internship, now you will likely also get paid.
But businesses might decide that interns are not worth the expense. “I think it may have a negative impact on this entranceway into a variety of professions and that’s what I would be worried about,” Abrams says.
It’s a worry shared by 19-year-old Juliana Rordorf, a New York University sophomore interning at a small consulting startup this summer. She says it is exactly the type of workplace that might not bother to hire interns if it had to pay; she says the company doesn’t need her as much as she needs them.
“I’m getting great connections, I’m able to actually take on real tasks,” Rordorf says. “Even being somewhere on time and having a real responsibility … and I would be concerned that this would take those opportunities away from other kids, or from me in the future.”
Besides, Rordorf says, she’s also had bad internships but she says it’s easy to quit an unpaid job.
Promoting Equality In The Workplace
Boston University law professor Michael Harper says the idea is not only to stop the exploitation of young people, but also to address the unfair advantage that goes to those who can’t afford to work for nothing.
“If you were poor you wouldn’t have had that opportunity, so another thing these laws do is provide more equality in the workplace,” he says.
Fox declined to comment, but released a written statement that says the company is disappointed and plans to appeal a court decision it calls “erroneous.”
Mark Jaffe of the New York Chamber of Commerce says the decision is already starting to make waves in the business community. “We know there’s a lot of businesses out there taking advantage of the internship situation — free labor — but the gig is up. You can’t get away with it anymore; somebody’s watching and you cannot abuse certain situations,” he says.
For his part, former intern Eric Glatt, who sued Fox, is hoping to move on to see what he’ll get in back pay and damages. Glatt could use the money. He has given up on the movie industry and is now in law school.