Glaciers in the Alps of Europe pose a scientific mystery. They started melting rapidly back in the 1860s. In a span of about 50 years, some of the biggest glaciers had retreated more than half a mile.
But nobody could explain the glacier’s rapid decline. Now, a new study from NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory uncovers a possible clue to why the glaciers melted before temperatures started rising: Soot from the Industrial Revolution could have heated up the ice.
Scientists trying to understand Europe’s climate for the past several hundred years have turned to the glaciers in the Alps because they preserve some of the temperature and precipitation history during that time.
If you look back through the 1600s and 1700s, the glaciers were big and quite stable, says NASA’s Tom Painter. That’s probably because Europe was in a prolonged cold spell, known as the Little Ice Age. “And then around 1860, 1865,[the glaciers] all started to retreat to lengths that they had not in the previous few hundred years,” he says.
To some historians, that retreat marks the end of the Little Ice Age. But there’s a problem: Europe didn’t actually heat up until the 1910s or 1920s. In fact, if you go by just air temperature and precipitation, the glaciers should have advanced, not retreated. So why would the glaciers have started to melt?
“It dawned on me that industrialization was kicking off then,” Painter says. “We have these visions from Charles Dickens and others of that time — the mid 1800s — of a huge amount of soot being pumped out into the atmosphere, not just in England but in France and Germany and Italy.”
Painter’s previous research has shown that dust blowing onto the Rocky Mountains is making the snow melt much faster there because dark snow absorbs a lot more sunlight.
Of course he couldn’t sample ice from the Alps that has already melted away, but he found a record of soot from ice samples higher up in the mountains. He and his colleagues argue in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that the glaciers didn’t simply melt away because the Little Ice Age petered out.
“What this tells us is that there was a human influence, very likely, reaching back all the way to what we had considered to be this natural cycle,” he says.
Other scientists puzzling over the Alpine glacial melt say Painter’s idea makes a lot of sense — even though it’s not an iron-clad case.
A team of geoscientists at The University of Utrecht in The Netherlands, has an automatic weather station on a glacier in Switzerland. “What we measure there is that every year the surface is darker, not due to black carbon but from dust from the surroundings,” says the team’s Rianne Giesen. “So I do think that dust or black carbon can make a strong contribution to the melt.”
The soot idea could also explain why the glaciers in the Alps started to melt decades before glaciers upwind from Europe did. Industrial pollution from Europe wasn’t blowing onto Iceland or Norway, which remained cold and frosty, says Gifford Miller at the University of Colorado.
“Maybe it gave the Alpine folks in Switzerland and the Italian Alps a bit of a head start in cultivating the highlands again,” he says.
Could that be why we have Swiss milk chocolate today instead of Norwegian chocolate? “Could be,” Miller says, with a chuckle.
Actually, it turns out that the Swiss did invent milk chocolate a decade or two after the glaciers started to give way to more pastureland, so it’s not an entirely nutty idea.
But Miller sees a much bigger lesson from understanding how soot and dust can bring about quick changes to the world’s glaciers. “Things that impact the climate system in abrupt ways are the things that people should be concerned about for the future.”
And as the story of the Alps suggests, dark particles can melt the world’s glaciers much more rapidly than gradual changes in the earth’s temperature can.